askKira newsletter
AI news that matters, for everyone. Every edition, newest first.
Anthropic's Dario Amodei, Google DeepMind's Demis Hassabis and OpenAI's Sam Altman have each made public statements in recent weeks calling for coordinated slowdowns, external oversight and independent evaluation bodies for frontier AI. Researcher Jacob Coxon resigned from Anthropic on 8 September, citing existential risk concerns. A detailed audit of 24 widely circulated AGI predictions found 19 were too poorly defined to be testable, and the two that were testable both missed their deadlines.
A former Anthropic researcher's public warning that AI could "kill us all by the end of the decade" has reignited debate across the industry. His view aligns with statements from senior figures at OpenAI, Google DeepMind and Meta, who signed a July statement urging governments to develop international governance tools. Meanwhile, the G20's new "Carolina Principles" have been criticised for prioritising deregulation over safety.
AI systems can now plan, access tools, write code and act without human intervention, and governance frameworks have not kept pace. Commentary referencing the 2026 International AI Safety Report highlights that principles and policy documents are insufficient when an agent holds API credentials or can trigger real-world actions. Practical governance now requires answering four questions before any agent goes live: who is accountable, what access is proportionate, has it been independently tested and can humans shut it down without the agent's cooperation?