Education · 3 March 2026
AI in Education
For teachers, school leaders and MATs
At askKira, we provide GDPR-compliant, secure AI built specifically for UK schools. Developed with over 100 education experts and aligned with DfE, Ofsted and EEF guidance, askKira helps teachers, school leaders and MATs work smarter, reduce workload and make data-driven decisions with confidence.
This week's roundup brings you the latest AI developments that matter for UK education.
UK Landscape & Policy
Rose Luckin: Flourishing cannot be automated
Leading UK academic Professor Rose Luckin warned this week that while AI can optimise efficiency, it cannot replace the 'moral ecology' of a school. Speaking on Teachers Talk Radio, she argued that education is about the formation of judgement and agency, not just productivity. She cautioned that if technology narrows learning to what can be predicted or standardised, schools risk losing the essential human elements of education.
Why it matters: As UK schools face pressure to cut costs, leaders must ensure AI is used to support teacher discernment rather than replace the professional judgement required for pastoral care and complex decision-making.
Read the source on LinkedIn →Cambridge updates digital literacy for the AI era
Cambridge has signalled updates to its digital literacy curriculum to address the rapid rise of generative AI. The move reflects a growing consensus that traditional ICT skills are no longer sufficient and that students require specific competencies to navigate an AI-saturated world. This shift aligns with broader calls from the sector for exam boards to modernise specifications.
Why it matters: Schools delivering Cambridge curriculums or preparing for future GCSE reforms should review their Key Stage 3 computing provision to ensure it covers critical AI evaluation, not just basic digital skills.
Read the source on LinkedIn →Strategy & Governance
The 'Velocity Problem' renders AI policies obsolete
A new analysis suggests that the traditional 18-month cycle for drafting and approving school policies is incompatible with the speed of AI development. The article argues that any detailed technical policy written today will be defunct by 2027. Instead, institutions are urged to adopt 'mindset-based governance' focused on intellectual humility and ethical imagination rather than exhaustive rulebooks.
Why it matters: MAT leaders should move away from rigid technical policies and instead draft 'principles-based' guidance that empowers staff to apply professional judgement as tools evolve.
Read the source on LinkedIn →Cognitive decline risks in tech-heavy learning
Following reports of declining cognitive performance linked to heavy device usage, experts are warning against viewing education as a software problem to be 'optimised'. The analysis highlights that education is a complex adaptive system shaped by relationships, not just data inputs. It suggests that privileging quantifiable efficiency over complex human development risks creating a 'blue screen of death' for student learning.
Why it matters: When planning IT budgets for the next academic year, business managers and heads must scrutinise whether new tools genuinely support cognition or merely offer superficial efficiency at the cost of deep learning.
Read the source on LinkedIn →Teaching & Learning
Classroom observations reveal AI as a 'crutch'
Teachers are reporting increasing instances of students using AI to bypass the struggle of learning, particularly in mathematics. One case study highlights a Year 8 pupil using AI to generate steps for homework without understanding the underlying concepts, resulting in shallow knowledge that collapses under questioning. The report emphasises that struggle is a necessary part of the learning process that AI must not shortcut.
Why it matters: Departments should review homework policies to ensure assessed tasks require in-class validation, preventing students from masking gaps in understanding with AI-generated outputs.
Read the source on LinkedIn →Study shows massive jump in student AI usage
A longitudinal study has tracked a significant increase in student AI uptake, rising from 44% to 76% for study tasks and up to 83% for assessment-related work. Crucially, the research found that ethical perceptions are shifting, with students who use the tools regularly developing more nuanced views than those who do not. The findings suggest that 'ban vs allow' debates are now redundant.
Why it matters: With usage now the norm rather than the exception, Sixth Forms and colleges must urgently update academic integrity workshops to focus on 'transparent use' rather than futile detection or prohibition.
Read the source on LinkedIn →